Francis Twisted Benedict XVI’s Words About "A True World Political Authority"
David Martin | The Daily Knight
In the wake of Benedict XVI’s passing, many have commented on his June 2009 encyclical, “Charity in Truth,” wherein he says, “there is urgent need of a true world political authority.” (67) The encyclical was released a day before leaders of a group of eight industrialized nations met to coordinate efforts to deal with the global meltdown, signaling a clear papal bid to prod leaders to a financially and morally responsible future. Benedict was calling for a reform of the United Nations and other world economic institutions that they not be a scandal and detriment to humanity. He was urging U.N. globalists to be moral and to guide by the teachings of Christ.
Looking at this a little deeper, Benedict by “true world political authority” was extending this to mean any true political entity that is grounded in charity and truth to help spread the Reign of Christ on earth. It was an indirect and skillful way of saying that the Roman Catholic Church is the One True World Authority that all nations, peoples, and governments should guide by.
Let us be clear: Benedict XVI was dead against globalism or the idea of a one-world government and represented everything that globalists are against. This is precisely why the globalist faction in Rome pressured him into stepping down in February 2013.
Benedict Quoted Out of Context
Unfortunately, Pope Francis in his September 2015 encyclical Laudato Si put a devious twist on Benedict’s words by citing the need for “a true world political authority” but in such a way as to suggest that all peoples be subject to the U.N. and *not to Christ. He accentuated this point in fall 2015 when he told reporters:
“When we acknowledge international organizations and we recognize their capacity to give judgment, on a global scale – for example the international tribunal in The Hague, or the United Nations – If we consider ourselves humanity, when they make statements, our duty is to obey … We must obey international institutions. The is why the United Nations were created.”
Clearly, Francis advocates that we obey globalists and population-control experts who advocate a one-world government and the depopulation of the planet. Francis is all about abolishing Catholicism and subduing mankind under a globalist regime. He’s about enculturating ecology and knitting humanity to the planet and he intentionally echoes signs and symbols proper to the True Religion in such a way as to deceive even the elect into conforming to this globalist cult.
Hence, what Benedict XVI meant by “true political world authority” is a reformed U.N. or political entity that follows Church teaching and is moral, whereas Francis by these words was suggesting that a political Antichrist step to the fore to guide humanity.
Antichrist Forces Control Rome
This shouldn’t seem outlandish when we consider that for the past nine years he has appointed antichrists, globalists, and LGBT sex-offenders to high positions in the Church while stomping on tradition and cancelling holy priests. His endorsement of criminals was evidenced in June 2017 when he conferred the prestigious St. Gregory Award – an honor traditionally reserved only for those who demonstrate outstanding merit in service to the Church and humanity – to radical abortion advocate Lillian Ploumen as she was completing a campaign to raise 300 million dollars to fund International Planned Parenthood and other like abortion agencies.
Equally appalling is the fact that in October 2021, Francis appointed U.N globalist and abortion advocate Jeffrey Sachs to a regular position in the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. This is not to mention that last July Francis praised homosexual advocate Father James Martin for a scandalous LGBT conference he hosted and for the “culture of encounter” he promotes amongst “LGBT Catholics.” On and on the list goes.
Obviously, Francis and Benedict in their encyclicals were not speaking of the same “world political authority” since the world authority Francis calls for enthusiastically applauds these atrocities while the authority Benedict called for condemns them. By repeating out of context Benedict’s words about a world political authority Francis was putting words in Benedict’s mouth and making it seem he was his precursor in the globalist school.
Nothing of the sort. Benedict was a Catholic monarch while Francis is an ecologist and humanist. Benedict was all about the Authority of Christ while Francis is about the authority of the U.N. Benedict was about maintaining the rule while Francis is about breaking the rules. Benedict was about bringing back tradition while Francis is about ending it.
There indeed is an urgent need for a true ecclesiastical authority to take a closer look at Francis’ election. With Benedict gone more and more prelates are stepping to the fore to join in a noble effort to right the wrong that Francis and his globalist coalition have wrought.
*One cannot obey the United Nations and obey Christ at the same time no more than one can obey Lucifer and Christ at the same time. The U.N. is the seat of the beast on earth. This is the great harlot that seduces the nations (Apocalypse 17).
Comments