We Need a Pope who will Repudiate Vatican II

David Martin | The Daily Knight

Since the close of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), we have seen a rigid and ongoing refusal among the bishops to speak out against Vatican II. Because of this, the Council has been allowed to exert its erroneous ideology on the Church for the past 60 years resulting in a drastic drop in vocations and diminished attendance at Holy Mass. The key objective of the Council was that the Church be one with the world rather than one with God.

The Council also fostered a denigrating attitude about praying to the Virgin Mary to the end that we have seen the clergy echoing the Protestant idea that we should pray only to Jesus and not to Mary. Since 1969, many Catholics have thrown their rosaries away.

A Pope Who is Marian and Selfless

Hence what is needed right now is a pope who is Marian and selfless. Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano seems to fit this description best as he conducts all his work in the name of the Blessed Virgin and has showed unrelenting zeal for defending the Church against modernist heresy. Vigano is the only prelate of our time who has had the zeal to declare that a true restoration of the Catholic Church can never take place unless the bishops first break all ties with Vatican II.

This shows him to be material for a pope – that and the fact that he knew ahead of time that his truthful testimony for the Faith would bring upon him the ax of Francis. But he didn’t care. He and Cardinal Pizzaballa are similar in this respect. In October 2023, Pizzaballa offered himself in ransom for 200 women and children in Palestine even if it meant losing his life. 

Needless to say, we need a pope who is willing put his life on the line by repudiating Vatican II. The Catholic bishops have a duty to openly point out its errors and illicitness before the Church. A prelate who is not willing to do this shows himself to be fear-ridden and unworthy of the Chair of Peter because he is allowing the influence of a bad council to be a detriment to the flock.

In 1990, Cardinal Ratzinger (later Benedict XVI) even told his friend Fr. Ingo Dolinger – a close friend and assistant of St. Padre Pio – that the Third Secret of Fatima spoke of “a bad council and a bad Mass” to come. The Council was providentially allowed to test the faithful of God (Apocalypse 3:10). Through the instrumentality of fallen bishops, Satan has giggled the bait of Modernism before the Church hoping that Catholics would take it. Unfortunately, many have.

Vatican II Started with Good Intent

This is not to imply that Vatican II wasn’t started on legitimate grounds. The Council indeed started with the best resolves, but it was immediately hijacked in the opening session whereby it lost its legal framework and went from being a Council to a revolution. The best Catholic thinkers after the Council including Professor Romano Amerio made this quite clear. Pope John XXIII on his deathbed even cried out to “stop the Council!” And how interesting to note that he “died” the following day, on June 3, 1963. His enemies laid him low. The Freemasons had already infiltrated the Council at this point.  

Freemason Cardinal Rampolla of Sicily

The appointment of the influential Cardinal Rampolla as Vatican Secretary of State in 1887 is what opened the door to the influx of Freemasonry into the Church. Rampolla himself was a Freemason whose servant and confidant was Cardinal Augustin Bea known for his subversion of the Faith. When Rampolla died, Bea committed the rest of his life to continuing the legacy of Rampolla, a role that was especially evident at Vatican II when he assumed the task of inviting the leaders of other religions and governments to the Second Vatican Council, including Soviet leaders. Bea arranged for Protestants to weekly submit texts to be used for the 16 documents of Vatican II. Following the Council, he was the first to openly admit that these Protestants contributed significantly to the documents.

If what has been alleged about Vatican II is true, its documents will certainly bear the fingerprints of collusion. One needn't look any further than the conciliar document on ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, which emphatically seeks to unite the Catholic Church with other religions.  

Consider this handful of excerpts from the Vatican II documents.

The restoration of unity among all Christians is one of the principal concerns of the Second Vatican Council. [1]

Along these lines, the document also says:

lt is allowable, indeed desirable that Catholics should join in prayer with their separated brethren. [8]

This proposed “interfaith worship” is forbidden by the Catholic Church, yet the document fully recommends this on the false basis that God works through other religions.

The Holy Spirit does not refuse to make use of other religions as a means of salvation. [UR]

Consider also this excerpt from the conciliar document Nostra Aetate:

Muslims adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men. (3)

Did the Council fathers forget the Quran’s teaching that Christ is not the Son of God? Had they considered its teaching that anyone who is not Muslim should be slain? Christ, whose divinity the Quran rejects, is the only True God “who has spoken to men,” so do we “misinterpret” Nostra Aetate by alleging it is dignifying an idolatrous religion? Indeed, we do not.

Can we understand now why our Church is where it’s at? Can we understand why we need a pope who will trash Vatican II without the scruple of having to work with It? The resolve to remain “true” to the Council is fear-guided, not God-guided. Archbishop Vigano is the only prelate of today who has said that the bishops must reject Vatican II if they ever expect the Church to be renewed.

The Only problem with Vigano

From this we can infer that Vigano is perhaps the most worthy candidate for the papacy. The problem with Vigano is that he now has the reputation of being excommunicated, but if the good cardinals want him as pope, they’ll find a way to nullify his “excommunication.” The best way to do this is by nullifying the two who expelled him, namely, Francis and his ghost writer Cardinal Victor Fernandez who is known for his grotesque erotic books.  

According to the mainline media, Cardinals Parolin and Tagle (dubbed Francis II) are the top "contenders" for the Chair of Peter, but the media might be flashing that line around just to demoralize the good Catholics. If in fact good cardinals were top runners-up, it is doubtful that the controlled media would say anything about this.

We Must Storm Heaven for a Holy Pope

Hence we must continue to storm Heaven for a good and holy pope to take the Chair of Peter. We need a pope who is one with God and who will labor incessantly to place Christ back in center view before Church. This will best be accomplished by mandating a universal return of the Traditional Latin Mass.

The prelates most apt to do this would be Cardinals Sarah, Burke, and Pizzaballa, and Bishops Strickland and Schneider. We indeed pray that a true prelate like these could take the Throne and take the Church back for us.