Providential Warnings Tied To The Last Apparition of Fatima
David Martin | The Daily Knight
The date October 13 has a special significance in modern Church history, since it marked the conclusion of the Virgin Mary’s apparitions at Fatima in 1917, wherein She predicted the satanic onslaught against the Catholic Church that would begin to unfold in the latter part of the 20th century. Providentially, several key events of the Church have occurred on October 13 which directly relate to the Fatima prophecy.
October 13, 1884 - Pope Leo XIII receives a supernatural manifestation wherein he hears a conversation between Christ and Satan, in which the latter says he will destroy the Catholic Church within 100 years. The manifestation occurs exactly 33 years to the day before the great Miracle of the Sun at Fatima. The “33” is providential in that it directly alludes to the Freemasons in its 33 degrees through which Satan would infiltrate the Vatican after 1960.
October 13, 1962 - Vatican II is hijacked and falls into the hands of the heretical “Rhine group” when the decision to elect the pontifically appointed candidates for the drafting commissions is blocked by Freemasons and a new slate of candidates is drafted, thus deflecting the course of the Council.
October 13, 1973 - The Mother of God delivers her warning at Akita, Japan, which includes this excerpt: “The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, and bishops against bishops…. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises.”
October 13, 1977 - Pope Paul VI declares to the world: “The tail of the devil is functioning in the disintegration of the Catholic world. The darkness of Satan has entered and spread throughout the Catholic Church, even to its summit. Apostasy, the loss of the faith, is spreading throughout the world and into the highest levels within the Church.”
October 13, 2014 - The October 2014 Extraordinary Synod on the Family issues its midterm report Relatio post disceptationem extending unconditional respect and welcome to those of “gay orientation.” The relatio triggers heated debate between the left and the right, bringing to new heights the fulfillment of “bishop against bishop, cardinal against cardinal.”
The Hijacking of Vatican II on October 13, 1962
Of particular significance is the incident of October 13, 1962, the 45th Anniversary of the Virgin Mary's last apparition at Fatima, since it opened the door and set in motion a plan for a new secularized church. Let us diverge briefly to recall the turbulent opening session of Vatican II that deflected the course of the Council and set the Barque of Peter floundering on a new and unchartered course that would eventually land it shipwreck. At the center of this coup to overthrow Vatican II were Cardinals Alfrink, Frings, and Liénart of the Rhine Alliance. Their objective was to gain control of the conciliar drafting commissions. A crucial vote was to be taken to determine the members of the commissions when Cardinal Liénart, a suspected Freemason, seized the microphone during a speech and demanded that the slate of 168 candidates be discarded and that a new slate of candidates be drawn up. His uncanny gesture was heeded and the election was postponed. The date was October 13, 1962. (Fr. Ralph Wiltgen, The Rhine Flows into the Tiber)
In his February 14, 2013 address to the clergy of Rome, Pope Benedict XVI brilliantly recounts this coup d’ etat at Vatican II:
“On the programme for this first day were the elections of the Commissions, and lists of names had been prepared, in what was intended to be an impartial manner, and these lists were put to the vote. But right away the Fathers said: ‘No, we do not simply want to vote for pre-prepared lists. We are the subject.’ Then, it was necessary to postpone the elections, because the Fathers themselves…wanted to prepare the lists themselves. And so, it was. Cardinal Liénart of Lille and Cardinal Frings of Cologne had said publicly: no, not this way. We want to make our own lists and elect our own candidates.” The preeminent Romano Amerio who had contributed significantly to the drafting of the original Vatican II outline cites how the legal framework of the Council was violated by this act: “This departure from the original plan” came about “by an act breaking the Council’s legal framework” so that “the Council was self-created, atypical, and unforeseen.” (Professor Romano Amerio, Iota Unum, 1985) After illicitly blocking the vote, this rebellious “Rhine group” resorted to boorish methods to force-install several of their own members onto the drafting commissions, so that from October 16 on nearly sixty-percent of the commissions were now chaired by “suspect theologians” that previously had been restricted under Pius XII. These would include dissenters like Hans Kung, Schillebeechx, and the pseudo-mystic Karl Rahner, the Council darling, who for the entirety of Vatican II was dating the notorious feminist Luise Rinser who had clamored for abortion and women priests. The enemies of the Faith had captured the key positions of the Council, which then enabled them to scrap John XXIII's plan for Vatican II (72 schemas) and to draft perfidious documents for the misguiding of the Church, i.e. the 16 documents of Vatican II.
Hence was born the Vatican II revolution. What would ensue from that point was a perfidious council that would alter the mindset and practice of countless millions of Catholics. Chanting would eventually give way to strumming, silent adoration would give way to liturgical festivity, and a new Mass with the priest facing the people would bring about a historic shift of focus where the emphasis is on the people and not on God. The New Mass under the title Novus Ordo Seclorum or New World Order would set the stage and begin paving the way for a coming New World Order, which the pope himself [Francis] would bring to a head. What would culminate in the end is the fulfillment of the Blessed Virgin’s prophecy at La Salette in 1846:
“Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of Antichrist”
Comentários