Priest Infiltrators and Not Paul VI Introduced the New Mass of Vatican II

David Martin | The Daily Knight

Catholic conservatives today sometimes point their finger at Pope Paul VI for having signed for the new Mass in 1969, not realizing that he never initiated the move to draft a new Mass. He neither composed the new Mass, nor did he revoke the Old Mass.    

In 1986, Pope John Paul II commissioned nine cardinals to look into the legal status of the Tridentine Latin Mass and it was unanimously concluded that Pope Paul VI never abrogated the Latin Mass, which means that the old Mass is still the official Mass of the Roman Catholic Church.

And too, the nine cardinals determined that Paul VI never gave bishops the right to forbid or restrict priests from saying the Traditional Latin Mass. Hence, priests today do not need permission to say the Latin Mass no more than they need permission to keep the Ten Commandments. Offering the old Mass is already their God-given right.

So we must ask ourselves: if an LGBTQ bishop excommunicates a Catholic group for keeping the Ten Commandments, would the excommunication be valid? Nay! The same applies with any illegitimate use of the keys. Sadly, there are false bishops today who use their position to try to destroy the Church.

Many bishops today are actually Communist infiltrators that were never ordained but who simply went through motions to fool everyone. Bella Dodd, a former head of the American Communist Party began revealing this 74 years ago. In 1952, she made her confession to the late Bishop Fulton Sheen, at which time he commissioned her to spread this word throughout the Church, which she did. Among other things, she revealed that she had placed 1100 communist agents into our Catholic seminaries.

Memoirs of an Anti-Apostle

Consider now the memoirs of an unrepentant Communist agent that were discovered by a Catholic nurse while caring for him following an auto accident he had been in. Unfortunately, he died a short time afterwards without being able to reveal his identity, so that he is known only by a code-name that was assigned to him by the Soviet Secret Police, that being SS 1025.

There were 1024 such agents that had gone before him, some of whom became bishops and who penetrated to high positions within the Vatican. The agent reveals how he became a “priest” who later collaborated with progressives at Vatican II to indoctrinate the Council with evil. 

The key objective of he and other like infiltrators was to start a new Mass that uses a table instead of an altar. The following is from his memoirs.  

“In the Mass, the words "Real Presence" and "Transubstantiation" must be deleted. We shall speak of ‘Meal’ and ‘Eucharist’ instead. We shall destroy the Offertory and play down the Consecration, and at the same time, we shall stress the part played by the people. In the Mass, as it is today, the priest turns his back to the people and fills a sacrificial function which is intolerable. He appears to offer his Mass to the great Crucifix hanging over the ornate altar.

“We shall pull down the Crucifix, substitute a table for the altar, and turn it around so that the priest may assume a presidential function. The priest will speak to the people much more than before. In this manner the Mass will gradually cease to be regarded as an act of adoration to God and will become a gathering and an act of human brotherhood. All these points will have to be elaborated in great detail and they may take anywhere up to 30 years before they are implemented, but I think that all my objectives will be fulfilled by 1974.”

Ring any bells? Can we understand why the Church is where it is today? Does this not confirm that the radical changes that came upon the Church after Vatican II were largely the work of Marxist agents that had captured key positions in our churches and seminaries?

Even so, it is important to remember that despite its defects the Mass today remains fully valid in that the Sacrifice of Christ is reenacted on the altar provided a legally ordained priest officiates at Mass. The efforts to destroy the Mass at Vatican II were not completely successful because Christ already promised that the gates of Hell would never fully prevail against his Church (Mt. 16:18).

Blueprint for New Mass Was Completed before Vatican II

The composition of the Novus Ordo Mass began in June 1960 under the direction of the Masonic Fr. Annibale Bugnini who was assisted by several radical-left agents. Known as the “Bugnini Draft,” the blueprint for the new Mass was approved by the Vatican’s liturgical commission in February 1962 without Pope John XXIII knowing of it. When he learned of it he canned Bugnini from two posts and forbade that he should attend the upcoming Second Vatican Council that would convene on October 11, 1962.

Unfortunately, Bugnini’s henchmen were able to smuggle the new Mass into Vatican II whereupon it became the conciliar darling, which was then adopted as the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy on December 7, 1962. Fourteen months later it would simply change names and be called “Sacrosanctum Concilium.”

Pope Paul should have never signed for the new Mass but in doing so he thought this was the work of God to renew the Church back to tradition. He was very naïve, and his enemies knew it. He was desperate to revive devotional practices like Eucharistic adoration and the Holy Rosary that were dying out. His foes “assured” him that the liturgical reform they presented him with would bring to fruition all his dreams to revive tradition, but this was just cheap political talk. Their intention was to destroy the Church and by 1972 the pope realized this.

While the Church’s liturgical constitution was in perfect shape in 1962, the faith of the clergy was in terrible shape, the proof being that they all too easily rolled along with the so-called reform that was introduced at Vatican II. On the ninth anniversary of his coronation on June 29, 1972, Pope Paul spoke to the clergy of Rome concerning Vatican II and said that while he and others had reposed hope in the Council it actually turned out to be the crack through which the devil entered the Church. He famously said:

“From some fissure the smoke of satan entered into the temple of God”

The fissure was Vatican II, which the pope was now in lamentation over so that he never again had anything good to say about it. As early as December 1965, he said, “Profane and secular humanism has revealed itself in its terrible, anticlerical nature, and in one sense has defied the Council. The religion of God made man has met the religion of man who makes himself God.” (December 7, 1965)

Again the pope said in 1970, “In many areas the Council has not so far given us peace but rather stirred up troubles and problems that in no way serve to strengthen the Kingdom of God within the Church or within its souls.” (Archbishop Lefebvre, Open letter to Confused Catholics)

This same Lefebvre was supposedly excommunicated in 1988, but the excommunication was invalid as was the July 1, 2026, excommunication of the SSPX that he founded because the Society rejected and continues to reject Vatican II on the grounds that it was an illicit and heretical Council, which it was. The consecrations of new bishops both in 1988 and on July 1 were only an excuse that the Vatican used to punish the SSPX.

The issue is Vatican II, which Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez say we are bound to follow, but in saying this they are wrong. In 1990, Cardinal Ratzinger (later Benedict XVI) who knew the Third Secret of Fatima said that the Secret spoke of a “bad council” and a “bad Mass” to come. The Council was Vatican II, which the Church’s enemies hijacked in the opening session after which they began introducing heretical teachings to the Church. The Council openly endorsed Islam, Hinduism, ecumenism and modernism, which the Catholic Church rejects, yet the Council embraced these and other errors.

Paul VI spoke of the “profane secular humanism” that profaned Pope John’s original plan for Vatican II, which means that Pope Leo should be echoing this today. Why isn’t he?