1977 Switzerland Exorcisms Revealed Clerical Malice Against John XXIII and Paul VI

David Martin | The Daily Knight

INTRODUCTION: In the early sixties, Cardinal Leo Suenens approvingly said, “Vatican II is the French Revolution of the Church.” Suenens framed the Council as a historic turning point, praising its break with the past, its progressivist “reforms,” and its ensuing impact on the Catholic Church. 

A parallel indeed can be drawn between the French Revolution and the Vatican II revolution (1962-1965). Queen Antoinette of France was a decent, loving, and devout Catholic who cared for her people and who always acted in their best interests. She said the daily Rosary and ardently professed her allegiance to God.

However, the French Freemasons under the influence of Voltaire had a mind to smear her reputation by portraying her as a harlot who was in cahoots with the Austrians and who said “Let them eat cake.” It was these Masonic agents that generated the French Revolution of 1789. Their game plan was to lay low and shift the blame onto Marie Antoinette as a means of angering France against its own leadership. This effectively served to instigate the French Revolution.

We saw this same strategy at Vatican II. The Freemasons generated the conciliar revolt against Apostolic Tradition, but their game plan was to lay low and shift the blame onto Popes John XXIII and Paul VI as a means of turning the faithful against papal leadership. 1  

Unfortunately, these popes made some slight human mistakes, which the hidden enemy then exploited to try to give “credibility” to their false charges against them. John XXIII and Paul VI were not the problem. It was neither their plan to change the Church and the Mass, nor was it their plan to alter doctrine to suit the times. This was the work of errant bishops under the spell of Masonic periti that had infiltrated the Second Vatican Council.

Demons Were Forced to Tell The Truth About Pope John XXIII

The following revelations are from a solemn exorcism that took place in Switzerland from 1975-1978, in which the demons under constraint were forced to reveal certain things about the modern Church. The session below is from June 18, 1977, and concerns John XXIII and the Second Vatican Council. Speaking through a possessed woman, the demons were forced by the Holy Virgin to tell the truth under the Solemn Exorcism, which was witnessed by several priests (listed below), all of whom expressed their conviction of the authenticity of the revelations made by the fallen spirits by order of the Blessed Virgin. The exorcisms are recorded in a book by Jean Marty (translated from French by Nancy Knowles Smith) entitled, Avertissements de I’Au’dela a I’Eglise Contemporaine-Aveux de I’Eufer. The revelations have been edited slightly to facilitate reading. 

Exorcists: Abbot Albert‑l`Arx, Niederbuchorten, Abbot Arnold Elig, Ramiswil, Abbot Ernest Fischer, Missionary, Gossau (St.‑Gall), Rev. Father Pius Gervasi, O.S.B., Disentis, Abbot Karl Holdener, Ried, Rev. Father Gregoire Meyer,—Trimbach, Rev. Father Robert Rinderer, C.P.P.S., Auw, Abbot Louis Veillard, Cerneux‑Pequignot. (Two other French priests also participated in the exorcisms.)

E = Exorcist

B = Beelzebub

E: In the name of the Most Blessed Virgin, tell us the truth!

B: John XXIII commenced his pontificate in 1958…. He was pious and had good intentions, although things did not always turn out as he had foreseen. The fact remains that he convoked the Council, and he would have done better had he refrained from doing so…. With the Council, a very great mistake was made. Even today, he would be turning in his grave if he knew what its results are.

E: Doesn’t he know?

B: Of course he knows. He already saw on his deathbed that it was not very smart. But it was already much too late. He did not know that this Council would have such deplorable, destructive, catastrophic, frightful consequences. He thought he was doing the right thing. He had good will. He believed that he was doing everything for the greatest good of the Church. He wished to renew what little needed renewing. Could he know that later, those cardinals, those fraudulent imitations of cardinals, those evil cardinals, would snatch the scepter from his hands and would plunge everything into this terrible state? Could he know that? He acted in good faith, so he reached Heaven. At all events, he is saved.

E: In the name of the Most Blessed Virgin, tell the truth and nothing but the truth!

B: He was humble and good, but he was not very gifted. At that time, it would have been necessary to install a very gifted Pope, knowing how to govern the Church and to maintain his authority in such a way that he could not be countermanded. But he learned that too late…. He suffered bitterly for it on his deathbed, and he sent for some of his intimate friends, or those whom he thought were loyal to him. He told them that he would like to shout to the world: “If only I had not convoked this Council!” Because he now saw the frightful consequences of it but was able to do nothing more…

E: In the name of the Most Blessed Virgin, tell the truth, and only what the Most Blessed Virgin wishes!

B: But those supposedly trustworthy men thought: “He is on his deathbed, he is no longer completely rational.” When a Council has been convoked, one can’t just simply say “We are stopping it” as if it were a tap which had been turned on full and only had to be turned off again. This Council no longer had a handle by which one could take control or slow it down. Things were already too far advanced for anyone to be able to do anything. The control was broken. It was already broken when John XXIII died.  Naturally, we were involved in the coup. We were trying to gain an advantage everywhere. Naturally, we did our utmost so that this tap could no longer be turned off to stop the flood. That is why you have dissensions which are deadly, catastrophic, frightful, and everything else the devil knows how to create. His trustworthy men said: “He no longer knows very well what he is saying.” The trustworthy men said to each other: “This must definitely not become known. Things are so far advanced, everything is so much under way and so involved, that one can no longer pull the foot out of the shoe.”

Exorcisms Reveal That Paul VI had a Double

The following revelations are from the same set of exorcisms discussed above but this one concerns Pope Paul VI and his double that was installed in the Vatican by the pope’s enemies. This particular session is from April 25, 1977. A handful of small edits have been made to facilitate reading.

Exorcists:

Abbot Albertl`Arx, Niederbuchorten, Abbot Arnold Elig, Ramiswil, Abbot Ernest Fischer, Missionary, Gossau (St. Gall), Rev. Father Pius Gervasi, O.S.B., Disentis, Abbot Karl Holdener, Ried, Rev. Father Gregoire Meyer, —Trimbach, Rev. Father Robert Rinderer, C.P.P.S., Auw, Abbot Louis Veillard, Cerneux Pequignot. (Two other French priests also participated in the exorcisms)

E = Exorcist

B = Beelzebub

E: In the name of Jesus, tell the truth, Beelzebub, in the name of the Precious Blood of Jesus Christ, speak!

B: She (the Blessed Virgin) makes me say: Alas! Alas! Some of the cardinals who surround the pope are wolves and...

E: Continue, in the name of Jesus, speak, Beelzebub!

B: We are doing everything to prevent people from becoming aware that there is a second Pope functioning. We are shrewder than all men put together. We are doing everything to keep that hidden... even “traditionalist” priests and lay people do not want to believe it nor to acknowledge it….

E: In the name of Jesus, speak only the truth!

B: For there reigns (in a loud voice) in actual fact, there reigns a false Pope, an imitation Pope. It is important that people are woken up gradually, for they are nearly all asleep.

Pope Paul VI (left) has a longer, more pointed nose compared to the Impostor (right) whose nose is shorter and rounder

(Exorcism Session of June 10, 1977)

E = Exorcist

B = Beelzebub

E: Does Pope Paul VI know that he has a double?

B: At all events, he knows what is going on…. He is suffering unspeakably because, owing to what those cardinals are doing [forging statements in his name], it is not what Heaven and what he himself would wish be is published in the world and in the Church, and which reaches the bishops. He is very well aware that he is like a prisoner, that he is, as it were, a prisoner of the Vatican. He suffers a great torment because of this.

E: Is the Pope informed about the cardinals? Has he investigated them? In the name of the Most Blessed Virgin Mother of God, tell us the truth!

B: He knows everything, everything, but he can do nothing. As we have said, his hands and feet are tied. He can do nothing, he receives injections. The doctor—listen carefully—who treats the Pope, is manipulated in such a way that the Pope receives certain poisons which are harmful to his head and to his mind. But in spite of that, he knows perfectly well what is good.... His strength is always so paralyzed, so reduced, that he no longer has the power to stand alone against the others. That is his martyrdom. It is a heavy trial and is permitted from On High. He is, as we have said, a martyr Pope. He who does not believe this will see, his eyes will be opened.

Paul VI (left taken 1970) has a more slender nose and face with a serene expression while the imposter (right taken 1977) has a fatter face with a cold, callous expression

E: How does one recognize the double?

B: We have already had to tell you that previously. Pick up the manuscripts (the exorcist revelations), there is more about it in them than we wanted to say; single out the revelations in which we spoke about the double on earlier occasions, and then read Kolberg’s book: “Conspiracy in the Vatican?”

E: Is what Kolberg wrote correct?

B: It is correct.

E: Has Kolberg written the truth? In his book “Conspiracy in the Vatican?,” is he telling the truth?

B: Kolberg tells the truth in his book. He has only a few small things that are not completely correct; but that is not very important.

THEODORE KOLBERG was a German author who wrote “Conspiracy in the Vatican” along with “The Fraud of the Century” (Der Betrug Des Jahrhunderts) which discuss the Imposter pope that reigned in the Vatican from 1975-1978. Under the influence of Satan and his Masonic cabal, three ring leaders were responsible for pulling off this stunt known today as “The Deception of the Century.” The three perpetrators were Cardinals Villot, Casaroli, and Benneli.

Skeptics contend that the enemies of the Church could never get away with something like this, but they need to think again. Antipopes of the past successfully pulled off similar schemes when Catholics were spiritually more enlightened and Satan had much less power. So if the enemy was able to pull off these stunts in enlightened times when Satan had little at his disposal, how much more likely is this to happen when the world is steeped in darkness and the adversary has at his disposal all the state-of-the-art technology to assist his designs? With things like the media, plastic surgery, and possessed doctors, these schemes are quite likely to succeed, especially when notorious Freemasons like Cardinal Villot help orchestrate them.

PERHAPS THE MOST shocking and revealing information on the impostor pope is found in the prophetic revelations of the Virgin Mary to the late seer, Veronica of the Cross of Bayside, New York (1970-1995). The following is an excerpt from the message given on September 27, 1975. Therein it states: "You must go back in the immediate years and bring the knowledge to mankind that these changes, the changes that have given bad fruits have not been given to you through the Holy Spirit and through your Vicar, Pope Paul VI. It is the web of satan reaching out."

Continuing she said:

"My child, I bring to you a sad truth, one that must be made known to mankind. In doing this, My child, you must proceed without fear. It must be made known to mankind. Our dear beloved Vicar, Pope Paul VI, he suffers much at the hands of those he trusts. My child, shout it from the rooftops. He is not able to do his mission. They have laid him low, My child. He is ill, he is very ill. Now there is one who is ruling in his place, an impostor created from the minds of the agents of satan. Plastic surgery, My child—the best of surgeons were used to create this impostor. Shout from the rooftops! He must be exposed and removed....

“The appearance in public is not Paul VI, it is the imposter pope. Medication of evil has dulled the brain of the true Pope, Pope Paul VI. They send into his veins poison to dull his reasoning and paralyze his legs. What evil creature have you opened the doors to the Eternal City and admitted? The agents of satan!”

Continuing she said:

“it is the diabolical plan of satan to have the hate of the world turned to the Vicar, Pope Paul VI, in Rome. The plan of satan is to heap upon his shoulders all the error and wrongdoing.”

It was two years later that the aforementioned Switzerland exorcisms revealed this plot. In addition there is a third source for this information. In his 1981 book, The Broken Cross: The Hidden Hand in the Vatican, Piers Compton covers this matter and brings forth some interesting observations that match those of other whistle-blowers that were surfacing at that time.

Therein he states:

“At length, stories emanating from Rome of sacrilege and abuses committed in church, with the approval of the Pope, became so startling, that groups of people in Europe and America decided to take action.

“This culminated with a Mr. Daniel Scallen of the Marian Press in Georgetown, Ontario, Canada, employing the Pinkerton Detective Agency in New York to investigate. One of the agency’s detectives was sent, in 1973, to Rome, and he returned with a story that dwarfed all other speculations, however sensational.

“He had determined that there were two Popes living in the Vatican, Paul VI and an impostor who had been made to resemble Montini [Pope Paul] with the aid of plastic surgery. Several such operations were necessary, and when colour photographs of the false Pope were sent to interested circles in Munich, where the impostor is still receiving concentrated study, there were certain noticeable differences in the two sets of features that could not be overcome.

“To point out the differences: Montini had clear blue eyes, large, and being long-sighted he only required glasses for near viewing. The impostor had green eyes, small, and he wore glasses with thick lenses.” (Piers Compton: The Broken Cross: The Hidden Hand in the Vatican)

A key reason that some traditionalists criticize Paul VI is because his double discredited him by doing errant things like praising the Charismatics, which the true Paul VI condemned in 1969 and again in 1972. Believing that the double was Pope Paul misled them about the pope.

On March 29, 1973, the Associated Press reported: “Pope Paul ruled today that women… may distribute Communion in Roman Catholic churches.” Yet on September 14, 1972, Pope Paul came down hard on the suggestion that women might play some part in the ministry of the priesthood, including the administration of Holy Communion. Clearly, the 1973 ruling was not from Paul VI but from his archrivals. Do real popes contradict themselves?

Pope Paul is charged with having called for a new Mass that scraps Latin and turns the priest around so he says the Mass facing the people with his back to the tabernacle, but the pope neither called for a new Mass nor did he compose any of it. 2 This was pushed on him by his enemies.

His only real fault was that he naively trusted his archrivals thinking that their “renewal” was the work of God to revive fervor in the Church, which by the late 50s was dying out. Evolution, humanism, modernism, secularism, and feminist rights were encroaching upon the Church, which had the pope begging God for a solution to counteract this, so these scoundrels convinced him that their “reform” would bring to fruition all his dreams for the Church. Initially, he believed them but later he repudiated them and even called them out as “anticlerics.”

The charges against Pope Paul hold no water. For while there are orthodox zealots who go about saying that Paul VI was a “homosexual,” a “Freemason,” and a “Communist,” there is no fact to back these claims, nor do they gel with the assessment of the late great St. Padre Pio who paid Paul VI the tribute of calling him the “Supreme Pastor of all Christianity” to whom he pledged “unconditional obedience” to his “illuminated directions.” (Padre Pio’s letter to Pope Paul VI, September 12, 1968)

If this was Padre Pio’s assessment of Paul VI, shouldn’t it be ours too?

1. That is, true papal leadership, not the present kind. A Vatican investigation is now underway to prove that neither Francis nor Leo were validly elected. Both broke the rules of JP11’s UDG governing papal elections and both have rejected Catholic doctrine. Both have said that that Jesus did not multiply the loaves, that all religions are paths to God, and that Mary is not Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of all Grace. All three professions are heretical.    

2. The exception to this was Eucharistic Prayer number 1, which he composed to offset the enemy plan to completely delete the Consecration from the Mass and simply have a ‘communion service.’ Before signing for the New Mass he was determined to first bring the Mass back up to code so that it would at least be valid. Has anyone ever considered that it was Pope Paul VI who saved the Mass?